<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 477 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267668</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the respondent in a case involving the interpretation of the Finance Act, 1994, and various notifications related to service tax liability. The Tribunal found the respondent eligible for exemptions under specific notifications and rejected the invocation of an extended period for demand by the Revenue. The decision highlighted the lack of deliberate malafide intent on the respondent&#039;s part and emphasized fairness and justice in the outcome.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 11:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=404885" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 477 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267668</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the respondent in a case involving the interpretation of the Finance Act, 1994, and various notifications related to service tax liability. The Tribunal found the respondent eligible for exemptions under specific notifications and rejected the invocation of an extended period for demand by the Revenue. The decision highlighted the lack of deliberate malafide intent on the respondent&#039;s part and emphasized fairness and justice in the outcome.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267668</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>