<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 476 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267667</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the previous order and directed a reevaluation of the case. It emphasized the importance of correctly applying tax categories, the necessity of exercising options under relevant schemes, and the requirement for documentary evidence to support claims during tax disputes. The matter was remanded for a fresh decision, considering the evidence provided by the appellant, with all other issues left open for further examination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2015 01:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=404884" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 476 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267667</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the previous order and directed a reevaluation of the case. It emphasized the importance of correctly applying tax categories, the necessity of exercising options under relevant schemes, and the requirement for documentary evidence to support claims during tax disputes. The matter was remanded for a fresh decision, considering the evidence provided by the appellant, with all other issues left open for further examination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267667</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>