<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 475 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267666</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the applications seeking amendment and rehearing of the appeal, stating that the alleged errors were not self-evident and did not qualify as mistakes apparent on the face of the record. The Tribunal upheld the restriction on Cenvat Credit utilization imposed by the Commissioner (Appeals) and sustained in the impugned order. The applications were deemed non-maintainable, leading to the dismissal of the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 15:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=404883" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 475 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267666</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the applications seeking amendment and rehearing of the appeal, stating that the alleged errors were not self-evident and did not qualify as mistakes apparent on the face of the record. The Tribunal upheld the restriction on Cenvat Credit utilization imposed by the Commissioner (Appeals) and sustained in the impugned order. The applications were deemed non-maintainable, leading to the dismissal of the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267666</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>