<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 467 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267658</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the denial of Cenvat credit for service tax paid for training in dispensing CNG, citing lack of an integral connection to appellant&#039;s business. However, they set aside the confirmation of demands, interest, and penalties due to incorrect invocation of the extended period, noting appellant&#039;s good faith belief in availing the credit. The appeal was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2015 01:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=404875" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 467 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267658</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the denial of Cenvat credit for service tax paid for training in dispensing CNG, citing lack of an integral connection to appellant&#039;s business. However, they set aside the confirmation of demands, interest, and penalties due to incorrect invocation of the extended period, noting appellant&#039;s good faith belief in availing the credit. The appeal was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267658</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>