<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (7) TMI 74 -  CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1072</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s order, including duty demands, confiscation, and penalties. The Tribunal emphasized the unreliability of Internet quotations for valuation purposes and found that the transaction value declared by the importer should be accepted. The appeals were pronounced allowed in court on 4-7-2006.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 06:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=40487" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (7) TMI 74 -  CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1072</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s order, including duty demands, confiscation, and penalties. The Tribunal emphasized the unreliability of Internet quotations for valuation purposes and found that the transaction value declared by the importer should be accepted. The appeals were pronounced allowed in court on 4-7-2006.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1072</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>