<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 459 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267650</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeals of certain manufacturer appellants where discrepancies in stock recording and weighing methods were found, leading to the goods not being liable for confiscation. It also reduced redemption fines and penalties in cases where the amounts were deemed excessive. The decision was made after a thorough analysis of the facts, arguments presented, and relevant legal provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2015 00:58:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=404867" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 459 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267650</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeals of certain manufacturer appellants where discrepancies in stock recording and weighing methods were found, leading to the goods not being liable for confiscation. It also reduced redemption fines and penalties in cases where the amounts were deemed excessive. The decision was made after a thorough analysis of the facts, arguments presented, and relevant legal provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267650</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>