<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 455 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267646</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, emphasizing the insufficiency of evidence to support allegations of clandestine removal of Sponge Iron. The judgment stressed the importance of concrete proof and the need for corroboration beyond mere entries in third-party records. The case was dismissed based on the lack of substantial evidence to establish clandestine removal, highlighting the significance of concrete evidence in such matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2016 13:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=404863" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 455 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267646</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, emphasizing the insufficiency of evidence to support allegations of clandestine removal of Sponge Iron. The judgment stressed the importance of concrete proof and the need for corroboration beyond mere entries in third-party records. The case was dismissed based on the lack of substantial evidence to establish clandestine removal, highlighting the significance of concrete evidence in such matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267646</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>