<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 444 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267635</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand of duty under Section 72(1) of the Customs Act for goods stored beyond the bond period, rejected the request for relinquishment of title under Section 68, and imposed a penalty under Section 117. The Tribunal dismissed preliminary objections raised by the appellant regarding procedural aspects. The appeal was disposed of, with the adjudicating authority tasked with determining the duty amount for time-expired bonds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2015 21:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=404852" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 444 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267635</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand of duty under Section 72(1) of the Customs Act for goods stored beyond the bond period, rejected the request for relinquishment of title under Section 68, and imposed a penalty under Section 117. The Tribunal dismissed preliminary objections raised by the appellant regarding procedural aspects. The appeal was disposed of, with the adjudicating authority tasked with determining the duty amount for time-expired bonds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267635</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>