<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 436 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267627</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, directing the AO to re-examine the distinction between trial runs and commercial production for the relevant assessment years. The AO must decide the issue in accordance with the law, considering the Tribunal&#039;s findings and providing the appellant with a fair hearing. The Tribunal&#039;s decision emphasized the need for the appellant to substantiate the claim of setting up a new industrial undertaking to qualify for deductions under sections 80I and 80HH.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2015 21:45:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=404844" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 436 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267627</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, directing the AO to re-examine the distinction between trial runs and commercial production for the relevant assessment years. The AO must decide the issue in accordance with the law, considering the Tribunal&#039;s findings and providing the appellant with a fair hearing. The Tribunal&#039;s decision emphasized the need for the appellant to substantiate the claim of setting up a new industrial undertaking to qualify for deductions under sections 80I and 80HH.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267627</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>