<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 435 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267626</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals for statistical purposes and remitted the matter back to the CIT(A) for fresh consideration. The Tribunal emphasized the need to reconsider the treatment of tied-up grants and the applicability of Section 11(1)(a) and Section 11(1)(c) in light of its findings. The order was pronounced on August 28, 2015.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2015 21:45:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=404843" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 435 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267626</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals for statistical purposes and remitted the matter back to the CIT(A) for fresh consideration. The Tribunal emphasized the need to reconsider the treatment of tied-up grants and the applicability of Section 11(1)(a) and Section 11(1)(c) in light of its findings. The order was pronounced on August 28, 2015.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267626</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>