<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (9) TMI 18 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1068</link>
    <description>Technical know-how fee and royalty paid under a technical know-how agreement are not includible in the assessable value of imported second-hand capital goods under Section 14 of the Customs Act, 1962 read with Rule 9 of the Customs Valuation Rules, 1988, unless the agreement contains a restraining clause limiting the importer&#039;s freedom to source goods from third parties. As no such contractual restraint was found in the agreement, the additions were unjustified and the appeal succeeded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 05:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=40483" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (9) TMI 18 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1068</link>
      <description>Technical know-how fee and royalty paid under a technical know-how agreement are not includible in the assessable value of imported second-hand capital goods under Section 14 of the Customs Act, 1962 read with Rule 9 of the Customs Valuation Rules, 1988, unless the agreement contains a restraining clause limiting the importer&#039;s freedom to source goods from third parties. As no such contractual restraint was found in the agreement, the additions were unjustified and the appeal succeeded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1068</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>