<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Valuation Dispute Leads to Excise Duty Refund; Contractual Obligation Ensures No Unjust Enrichment Under Agreement with HLL.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=25841</link>
    <description>Refund - unjust enrichment - excess payment of duty due to valuation dispute - in terms of legally enforceable Agreement of the appellant with HLL, the loan amount, was to be returned to HLL as soon as the Appellant gets refund of the excise duty; the refund would not be hit by the bar of unjust enrichment - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2015 18:24:02 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2015 18:24:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=404815" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Valuation Dispute Leads to Excise Duty Refund; Contractual Obligation Ensures No Unjust Enrichment Under Agreement with HLL.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=25841</link>
      <description>Refund - unjust enrichment - excess payment of duty due to valuation dispute - in terms of legally enforceable Agreement of the appellant with HLL, the loan amount, was to be returned to HLL as soon as the Appellant gets refund of the excise duty; the refund would not be hit by the bar of unjust enrichment - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2015 18:24:02 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=25841</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>