<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tribunal Misinterprets Partner Statements, Overlooks Evidence in Goods Undervaluation Case at Chennai and Mumbai Ports.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=25834</link>
    <description>Undervaluation of goods - no documentary evidence was produced by the assessee to support the plea that the goods at Chennai port were inferior in quality than the goods imported and cleared at Mumbai port - Tribunal has not only misinterpreted the statements of two partners of the assessee, it has also sidetracked and ignored other relevant material. - SC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2015 18:16:41 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2015 18:16:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=404808" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tribunal Misinterprets Partner Statements, Overlooks Evidence in Goods Undervaluation Case at Chennai and Mumbai Ports.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=25834</link>
      <description>Undervaluation of goods - no documentary evidence was produced by the assessee to support the plea that the goods at Chennai port were inferior in quality than the goods imported and cleared at Mumbai port - Tribunal has not only misinterpreted the statements of two partners of the assessee, it has also sidetracked and ignored other relevant material. - SC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2015 18:16:41 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=25834</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>