https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175172 Writ jurisdiction under Article 226 can extend to consequential restitution where seized money was wrongfully retained and the authority earned interest on it; the accretion belongs with the restored principal, and the claim was maintainable to that extent. The principles of restitution and unjust enrichment supported relief because the facts were undisputed and the State could not retain the benefit of the fixed deposit interest after belated refund. A further claim for interest on that accrued interest was not ordinarily maintainable in writ proceedings and was left to be pursued in civil suit. en-us Fri, 13 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 09 Nov 2015 17:32:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175172 Writ jurisdiction under Article 226 can extend to consequential restitution where seized money was wrongfully retained and the authority earned interest on it; the accretion belongs with the restored principal, and the claim was maintainable to that extent. The principles of restitution and unjust enrichment supported relief because the facts were undisputed and the State could not retain the benefit of the fixed deposit interest after belated refund. A further claim for interest on that accrued interest was not ordinarily maintainable in writ proceedings and was left to be pursued in civil suit. Case-Laws FEMA Fri, 13 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175172