<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 404 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267595</link>
    <description>The HC upheld the assessee&#039;s claim allowing the cost of Employees Stock Option (ESOP) to be debited to the profit and loss account. Relying on precedent from the Madras HC and its own prior ruling, the court ruled that such expenses are revenue in nature and should not be disallowed. The decision favored the assessee, permitting the deduction of ESOP-related costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2025 12:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=404770" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 404 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267595</link>
      <description>The HC upheld the assessee&#039;s claim allowing the cost of Employees Stock Option (ESOP) to be debited to the profit and loss account. Relying on precedent from the Madras HC and its own prior ruling, the court ruled that such expenses are revenue in nature and should not be disallowed. The decision favored the assessee, permitting the deduction of ESOP-related costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267595</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>