<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 397 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267588</link>
    <description>Filing Form 3AA during assessment proceedings, even though it was not enclosed with the return, constituted sufficient procedural compliance for claiming additional depreciation. The claim itself was not disputed on merits; the objection related only to timing of the form. Because the form was furnished before the assessment order was finalised, the statutory requirement was met in substance and the objection to the allowance failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2025 11:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=404763" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 397 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267588</link>
      <description>Filing Form 3AA during assessment proceedings, even though it was not enclosed with the return, constituted sufficient procedural compliance for claiming additional depreciation. The claim itself was not disputed on merits; the objection related only to timing of the form. Because the form was furnished before the assessment order was finalised, the statutory requirement was met in substance and the objection to the allowance failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267588</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>