<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 386 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267577</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decisions on all three issues, emphasizing the application of section 45(2) of the Income-tax Act for income arising from land conversion into stock-in-trade. The Tribunal&#039;s findings regarding the year of conversion and the onus of proof on the Assessing Officer were supported, leading to the dismissal of the appeal due to the lack of substantial questions of law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2015 16:29:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=404752" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 386 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267577</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decisions on all three issues, emphasizing the application of section 45(2) of the Income-tax Act for income arising from land conversion into stock-in-trade. The Tribunal&#039;s findings regarding the year of conversion and the onus of proof on the Assessing Officer were supported, leading to the dismissal of the appeal due to the lack of substantial questions of law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267577</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>