https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267572 The appeals filed by the appellants were dismissed, upholding the OIO of May 17, 2013. The decision was based on the findings that the appellants had knowledge of the smuggled garlic in their trucks, justifying the confiscation, redemption fine, and penalty imposition. The Adjudicating authority's reasoning was deemed sound, and no interference was warranted in the adjudication order. en-us Fri, 18 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 Oct 2016 15:23:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267572 The appeals filed by the appellants were dismissed, upholding the OIO of May 17, 2013. The decision was based on the findings that the appellants had knowledge of the smuggled garlic in their trucks, justifying the confiscation, redemption fine, and penalty imposition. The Adjudicating authority's reasoning was deemed sound, and no interference was warranted in the adjudication order. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 18 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267572