<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 379 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267570</link>
    <description>The Bombay HC dismissed the appeal as no substantial question of law was found in the Tribunal&#039;s refusal to condone a delay in filing a statutory appeal. The delay was attributed to officials not being appointed or the company lacking a complete set of officers, deemed unreasonable by the Tribunal. The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s discretion as lawful, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2015 16:16:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=404744" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 379 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267570</link>
      <description>The Bombay HC dismissed the appeal as no substantial question of law was found in the Tribunal&#039;s refusal to condone a delay in filing a statutory appeal. The delay was attributed to officials not being appointed or the company lacking a complete set of officers, deemed unreasonable by the Tribunal. The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s discretion as lawful, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267570</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>