<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 377 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267568</link>
    <description>Declared import value may be rejected where reliable comparable import data and the importer&#039;s own admissions show the price is artificially low, and the importer fails to substantiate a claim of inferior quality or absence of warranty support with credible documentary evidence. The valuation can then be determined by reasonable means under the Customs Valuation Rules, consistent with Section 14 of the Customs Act, using higher comparable import values from the same importer or similar goods. On the facts noted, the declared values were rejected, Rule 8 valuation was upheld, and the differential duty determination was restored.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2016 12:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=404742" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 377 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267568</link>
      <description>Declared import value may be rejected where reliable comparable import data and the importer&#039;s own admissions show the price is artificially low, and the importer fails to substantiate a claim of inferior quality or absence of warranty support with credible documentary evidence. The valuation can then be determined by reasonable means under the Customs Valuation Rules, consistent with Section 14 of the Customs Act, using higher comparable import values from the same importer or similar goods. On the facts noted, the declared values were rejected, Rule 8 valuation was upheld, and the differential duty determination was restored.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267568</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>