https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175165 Notices requiring registration and luxury tax compliance under the Karnataka Tax on Luxuries Act were to be examined by the competent authority first, because the petitioner's replies had not yet been considered in light of the amended definition of "marriage hall" effective from 01.04.2012 and the exemption notification for specified industrial exhibitions. The petitioner was directed to register under protest from 01.04.2012 without prejudice to its contentions, while the authority was left to determine the interim tax liability on the existing and additional replies in accordance with law. The broader constitutional validity challenge to the amended provisions was left open. en-us Fri, 08 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 09 Nov 2015 15:54:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175165 Notices requiring registration and luxury tax compliance under the Karnataka Tax on Luxuries Act were to be examined by the competent authority first, because the petitioner's replies had not yet been considered in light of the amended definition of "marriage hall" effective from 01.04.2012 and the exemption notification for specified industrial exhibitions. The petitioner was directed to register under protest from 01.04.2012 without prejudice to its contentions, while the authority was left to determine the interim tax liability on the existing and additional replies in accordance with law. The broader constitutional validity challenge to the amended provisions was left open. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Fri, 08 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175165