https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175163 The Supreme Court held that the charges against the appellant were specific and not vague. Non-supply of certain documents did not prejudice the appellant as they were not essential for the defense. Reliance on CBI statements and the findings of the Enquiry Officer were deemed appropriate and not perverse. The Court reinstated the order removing the appellant from service, overturning previous decisions. The appeal was allowed with no costs awarded. en-us Mon, 30 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Nov 2015 19:58:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175163 The Supreme Court held that the charges against the appellant were specific and not vague. Non-supply of certain documents did not prejudice the appellant as they were not essential for the defense. Reliance on CBI statements and the findings of the Enquiry Officer were deemed appropriate and not perverse. The Court reinstated the order removing the appellant from service, overturning previous decisions. The appeal was allowed with no costs awarded. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 30 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175163