<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 358 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267549</link>
    <description>Where an assessee voluntarily restricts a rebate claim before sanction, the sanction order operates only on the reduced claim. The balance amount, being excess duty paid on a different legal footing, is not treated as a rejected rebate component and may be claimed separately as refund. The earlier rebate order does not attain finality against that distinct component, so no appeal against the first order is required to preserve the later refund claim. On that basis, the order denying the subsequent refund was held unsustainable and the relief to the assessee was restored.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2015 14:55:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=404715" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 358 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267549</link>
      <description>Where an assessee voluntarily restricts a rebate claim before sanction, the sanction order operates only on the reduced claim. The balance amount, being excess duty paid on a different legal footing, is not treated as a rejected rebate component and may be claimed separately as refund. The earlier rebate order does not attain finality against that distinct component, so no appeal against the first order is required to preserve the later refund claim. On that basis, the order denying the subsequent refund was held unsustainable and the relief to the assessee was restored.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267549</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>