<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (2) TMI 1150 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175162</link>
    <description>Upfront appraisal fees received before any debt came into existence were not interest under section 2(28A) or Article 12 of the India-UK DTAA because they lacked a debt-claim nexus, but front-end fees linked to debt investments were treated as interest income within both the statutory and treaty definitions. Directors&#039; fees paid for attending board meetings as nominee directors were not fees for technical services, as no technical knowledge, skill, or know-how was made available under Article 13(4). Capital gains from transfer of shares of an Indian company were taxable in India under section 9(1)(i), since such shares were treated as rights in an Indian capital asset situated in India.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2015 14:47:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=404713" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (2) TMI 1150 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175162</link>
      <description>Upfront appraisal fees received before any debt came into existence were not interest under section 2(28A) or Article 12 of the India-UK DTAA because they lacked a debt-claim nexus, but front-end fees linked to debt investments were treated as interest income within both the statutory and treaty definitions. Directors&#039; fees paid for attending board meetings as nominee directors were not fees for technical services, as no technical knowledge, skill, or know-how was made available under Article 13(4). Capital gains from transfer of shares of an Indian company were taxable in India under section 9(1)(i), since such shares were treated as rights in an Indian capital asset situated in India.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175162</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>