<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 348 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267539</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, granting interest on the delayed refund amount based on the timeline of the refund claim and the subsequent refund sanction. The decision emphasized the significance of timely filing of refund claims and compliance with refund procedures to ensure entitlement to interest on delayed refunds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2015 14:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=404699" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 348 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267539</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, granting interest on the delayed refund amount based on the timeline of the refund claim and the subsequent refund sanction. The decision emphasized the significance of timely filing of refund claims and compliance with refund procedures to ensure entitlement to interest on delayed refunds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267539</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>