<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 347 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267538</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that a multiplex cinema hall was entitled to cenvat credit on input services utilized for advertisement agency services, despite Revenue&#039;s contention that the services were exclusively for exempted movie theatre operation. The Tribunal found the services integral to the advertisement agency operations, allowing the multiplex to avail the credit. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, upholding the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2016 16:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=404698" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 347 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267538</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that a multiplex cinema hall was entitled to cenvat credit on input services utilized for advertisement agency services, despite Revenue&#039;s contention that the services were exclusively for exempted movie theatre operation. The Tribunal found the services integral to the advertisement agency operations, allowing the multiplex to avail the credit. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, upholding the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267538</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>