<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 345 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267536</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the impugned order, ruling that the commission received for the sale of RBI bonds should be considered as cum-tax amount for calculating service tax liability when tax is not charged separately. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal, citing previous judgments and emphasizing that the gross amount should be used to determine tax liability in such cases. The decision affirmed the legality of the impugned order and highlighted the importance of considering the entire amount received as cum-tax for taxable purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 May 2016 11:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=404689" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 345 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267536</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the impugned order, ruling that the commission received for the sale of RBI bonds should be considered as cum-tax amount for calculating service tax liability when tax is not charged separately. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal, citing previous judgments and emphasizing that the gross amount should be used to determine tax liability in such cases. The decision affirmed the legality of the impugned order and highlighted the importance of considering the entire amount received as cum-tax for taxable purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267536</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>