https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175154 A lease exceeding one year could not be renewed for a further fixed term without a registered instrument executed by both parties; in the absence of such registration after expiry of the original term, continued possession and acceptance of rent attracted holding over, and the tenancy became month to month. A notice to quit was construed pragmatically and, on the facts, sufficiently required delivery of possession on the stated date; once the lessee's tenancy was validly terminated, no separate notice to the sub-lessee was necessary where the decree was otherwise binding. The eviction challenge therefore failed. en-us Tue, 03 May 1988 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 09 Nov 2015 12:51:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175154 A lease exceeding one year could not be renewed for a further fixed term without a registered instrument executed by both parties; in the absence of such registration after expiry of the original term, continued possession and acceptance of rent attracted holding over, and the tenancy became month to month. A notice to quit was construed pragmatically and, on the facts, sufficiently required delivery of possession on the stated date; once the lessee's tenancy was validly terminated, no separate notice to the sub-lessee was necessary where the decree was otherwise binding. The eviction challenge therefore failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 03 May 1988 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175154