https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175150 A statement in earlier tenancy proceedings will amount to an admission only if it is clear, relevant and legally usable; a deposition that is inconsistent with a landlord-tenant relationship and relates to unrelated lands cannot prove tenancy, and a witness must be confronted with the document in cross-examination before it is used against him. Record-of-rights entries create only a rebuttable presumption and cannot override contrary oral and documentary evidence. Revisional interference is not justified merely because a different factual view is possible; it requires an error of law on the face of the record. On these principles, the tenancy claim was not established and concurrent findings of fact were not liable to be disturbed. en-us Thu, 20 Jan 1977 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 09 Nov 2015 11:48:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175150 A statement in earlier tenancy proceedings will amount to an admission only if it is clear, relevant and legally usable; a deposition that is inconsistent with a landlord-tenant relationship and relates to unrelated lands cannot prove tenancy, and a witness must be confronted with the document in cross-examination before it is used against him. Record-of-rights entries create only a rebuttable presumption and cannot override contrary oral and documentary evidence. Revisional interference is not justified merely because a different factual view is possible; it requires an error of law on the face of the record. On these principles, the tenancy claim was not established and concurrent findings of fact were not liable to be disturbed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 20 Jan 1977 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175150