<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (7) TMI 73 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1052</link>
    <description>A beneficial exemption policy for physically handicapped persons allowed import of specially modified vehicles without an import licence or Customs Clearance Permit once duty relief was granted. The Bombay HC noted that the petitioner had satisfied the exemption conditions and that customs duty relief had been accorded subject to the stated liabilities under the customs and finance laws. In that context, insisting on a Customs Clearance Permit would defeat the policy&#039;s welfare object and create an unjustified administrative barrier. The Court therefore held the permit demand illegal, directed clearance of the vehicle without that permit, and ordered cancellation of the bank guarantee with consequential monetary relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 05:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=40467" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (7) TMI 73 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1052</link>
      <description>A beneficial exemption policy for physically handicapped persons allowed import of specially modified vehicles without an import licence or Customs Clearance Permit once duty relief was granted. The Bombay HC noted that the petitioner had satisfied the exemption conditions and that customs duty relief had been accorded subject to the stated liabilities under the customs and finance laws. In that context, insisting on a Customs Clearance Permit would defeat the policy&#039;s welfare object and create an unjustified administrative barrier. The Court therefore held the permit demand illegal, directed clearance of the vehicle without that permit, and ordered cancellation of the bank guarantee with consequential monetary relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1052</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>