https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175145 Superior courts must exercise judicial restraint and use sober, dignified language when correcting an order of a subordinate judicial officer. Even if the underlying order is erroneous, motive-imputing remarks, intemperate criticism, or punitive directions against the officer are unwarranted unless strictly necessary. The proper course is reasoned adjudication, with administrative action if required. The adverse remarks, direction, and related record entries were expunged, leaving no adverse judicial censure against the officer. en-us Thu, 17 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 13 Nov 2015 18:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175145 Superior courts must exercise judicial restraint and use sober, dignified language when correcting an order of a subordinate judicial officer. Even if the underlying order is erroneous, motive-imputing remarks, intemperate criticism, or punitive directions against the officer are unwarranted unless strictly necessary. The proper course is reasoned adjudication, with administrative action if required. The adverse remarks, direction, and related record entries were expunged, leaving no adverse judicial censure against the officer. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 17 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175145