<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (5) TMI 267 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175143</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court held that the impugned order of dismissal was null and void due to the denial of a reasonable opportunity to the appellant, a Superintendent of Police. The High Court&#039;s judgment was set aside, and the dismissal order was quashed. The appellant was deemed to have continued in service until superannuation in 1983, and the State Government was prohibited from initiating a fresh inquiry. The appeal was allowed with costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 May 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2015 10:30:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=404664" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (5) TMI 267 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175143</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court held that the impugned order of dismissal was null and void due to the denial of a reasonable opportunity to the appellant, a Superintendent of Police. The High Court&#039;s judgment was set aside, and the dismissal order was quashed. The appellant was deemed to have continued in service until superannuation in 1983, and the State Government was prohibited from initiating a fresh inquiry. The appeal was allowed with costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 May 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175143</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>