<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (1) TMI 42 - SECRETARY GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1051</link>
    <description>Rebate of Central Excise duty on exported goods could not be refused to the manufacturer merely because the merchant exporter claimed drawback. The manufacturer had exported terry towels through a merchant exporter, made the required ARE-1 declarations, and complied with the rebate notification issued under Rule 18 of the Central Excise Rules, 2001. The rebate notification did not make entitlement conditional on the exporter&#039;s non-claim of drawback. Any irregularity in obtaining drawback could be dealt with under the drawback law, but it was not a valid basis to deny rebate to the manufacturer when the rebate conditions were otherwise satisfied.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 19:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=40466" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (1) TMI 42 - SECRETARY GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1051</link>
      <description>Rebate of Central Excise duty on exported goods could not be refused to the manufacturer merely because the merchant exporter claimed drawback. The manufacturer had exported terry towels through a merchant exporter, made the required ARE-1 declarations, and complied with the rebate notification issued under Rule 18 of the Central Excise Rules, 2001. The rebate notification did not make entitlement conditional on the exporter&#039;s non-claim of drawback. Any irregularity in obtaining drawback could be dealt with under the drawback law, but it was not a valid basis to deny rebate to the manufacturer when the rebate conditions were otherwise satisfied.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1051</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>