<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 338 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267529</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appellant&#039;s plea to set aside the service tax demand and interest, upholding the authority of the Commissioner of Central Excise, Pune, in raising the service tax demand on property rent. The Tribunal found no error in its decision regarding the utilization of Cenvat Credit for paying service tax, leading to the conclusion that interest was payable. The judgment finalized on 20.10.2015 upheld the service tax demand and interest payment based on the utilization of input service tax credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2015 18:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=404607" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 338 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267529</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appellant&#039;s plea to set aside the service tax demand and interest, upholding the authority of the Commissioner of Central Excise, Pune, in raising the service tax demand on property rent. The Tribunal found no error in its decision regarding the utilization of Cenvat Credit for paying service tax, leading to the conclusion that interest was payable. The judgment finalized on 20.10.2015 upheld the service tax demand and interest payment based on the utilization of input service tax credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267529</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>