<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 324 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267515</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court heard appeals concerning the under valuation of cellular telephones imported by assessees and the inclusion of software value for duty payment. The Court remitted the matter back to CESTAT for decision by a larger bench, directing consideration of common evidence in all cases. The CESTAT decisions were set aside, and the matters were remitted for fresh consideration within a year.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2016 10:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=404593" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 324 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267515</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court heard appeals concerning the under valuation of cellular telephones imported by assessees and the inclusion of software value for duty payment. The Court remitted the matter back to CESTAT for decision by a larger bench, directing consideration of common evidence in all cases. The CESTAT decisions were set aside, and the matters were remitted for fresh consideration within a year.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267515</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>