<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 316 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267507</link>
    <description>An SSI unit could claim SSI exemption on its own clearances while separately treating duty-paid goods manufactured for another person under that person&#039;s brand name. Because the notification scheme excludes third-party branded clearances from the aggregate value for SSI exemption, those branded goods fall under the normal excise regime when cleared on payment of duty. On that basis, inputs used in manufacturing such branded goods were eligible for Modvat credit, since duty had already suffered on the finished goods. The assessee&#039;s own products and the branded job-work goods were to be treated distinctly for the exemption scheme, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 May 2016 17:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=404585" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 316 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267507</link>
      <description>An SSI unit could claim SSI exemption on its own clearances while separately treating duty-paid goods manufactured for another person under that person&#039;s brand name. Because the notification scheme excludes third-party branded clearances from the aggregate value for SSI exemption, those branded goods fall under the normal excise regime when cleared on payment of duty. On that basis, inputs used in manufacturing such branded goods were eligible for Modvat credit, since duty had already suffered on the finished goods. The assessee&#039;s own products and the branded job-work goods were to be treated distinctly for the exemption scheme, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267507</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>