<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 298 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267489</link>
    <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appeal, deleting the disallowance of NBHC bank guard pay but remanding the issue of rent payments to government entities back to the AO for a fresh decision. The judgment emphasized the need for proper evidence to claim exemptions under the Income-tax Act and compliance with TDS provisions for contractual payments. The appellant&#039;s challenge to the disallowances under section 40(a)(ia) was upheld, stressing the importance of supporting documentation and adherence to tax regulations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2015 10:10:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=404567" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 298 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267489</link>
      <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appeal, deleting the disallowance of NBHC bank guard pay but remanding the issue of rent payments to government entities back to the AO for a fresh decision. The judgment emphasized the need for proper evidence to claim exemptions under the Income-tax Act and compliance with TDS provisions for contractual payments. The appellant&#039;s challenge to the disallowances under section 40(a)(ia) was upheld, stressing the importance of supporting documentation and adherence to tax regulations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267489</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>