https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267487 The ITAT set aside the CIT(A)'s order due to a violation of natural justice principles, granting the appellant a fair hearing opportunity. The ITAT directed the CIT(A) to reevaluate the calculation of fringe benefits based on the appellant's figures, emphasizing accurate assessment. The ITAT remanded the matter back to the CIT(A) for a fresh decision after acknowledging the procedural lapse in the ex parte order, ensuring the appellant's right to be heard. The ITAT allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, highlighting the significance of procedural fairness and accurate assessment in tax cases. en-us Fri, 09 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 07 Nov 2015 17:57:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267487 The ITAT set aside the CIT(A)'s order due to a violation of natural justice principles, granting the appellant a fair hearing opportunity. The ITAT directed the CIT(A) to reevaluate the calculation of fringe benefits based on the appellant's figures, emphasizing accurate assessment. The ITAT remanded the matter back to the CIT(A) for a fresh decision after acknowledging the procedural lapse in the ex parte order, ensuring the appellant's right to be heard. The ITAT allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, highlighting the significance of procedural fairness and accurate assessment in tax cases. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 09 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267487