<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (3) TMI 450 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175124</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the miscellaneous application seeking recall of the order, emphasizing that rectification is not possible when the issue is debatable. The Tribunal held that the errors pointed out required a detailed process of reasoning and were not mistakes apparent on the face of the record. It concluded that the arguments presented amounted to a review of the earlier order, which exceeded the scope of rectification powers.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2017 08:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=404554" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (3) TMI 450 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175124</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the miscellaneous application seeking recall of the order, emphasizing that rectification is not possible when the issue is debatable. The Tribunal held that the errors pointed out required a detailed process of reasoning and were not mistakes apparent on the face of the record. It concluded that the arguments presented amounted to a review of the earlier order, which exceeded the scope of rectification powers.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175124</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>