<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (7) TMI 425 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175118</link>
    <description>Service regulations made under the repealed Air Corporations Act, 1953 did not continue in force after repeal unless expressly preserved by the repealing statute. Section 8 of the Air Corporations (Transfer of Undertakings and Repeal) Act, 1994 saved the remuneration, terms and conditions, rights and privileges of employees in service on the appointed day, but it did not save the subordinate service regulations themselves. That limited saving protected existing employees only and did not preserve the regulations for later entrants. The service regulations therefore ceased to be effective from 29 January 1994, and the challenge based on the Standing Orders Act failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2015 17:16:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=404541" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (7) TMI 425 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175118</link>
      <description>Service regulations made under the repealed Air Corporations Act, 1953 did not continue in force after repeal unless expressly preserved by the repealing statute. Section 8 of the Air Corporations (Transfer of Undertakings and Repeal) Act, 1994 saved the remuneration, terms and conditions, rights and privileges of employees in service on the appointed day, but it did not save the subordinate service regulations themselves. That limited saving protected existing employees only and did not preserve the regulations for later entrants. The service regulations therefore ceased to be effective from 29 January 1994, and the challenge based on the Standing Orders Act failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175118</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>