<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1975 (7) TMI 150 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175119</link>
    <description>A budgeted government liability becomes attachable in execution where official correspondence shows a present, enforceable debt and not a mere proposed allocation; the amount was therefore validly attached. The communication from the Accountant General placing payment under the Court&#039;s control reinforced that the debt had crystallised. On co-operative society powers, the enabling legislation permitted delegation of all powers exercisable by the Central Registrar, and the delegation notification was wide enough to include the dissolution of the society and appointment of a liquidator. The delegation was therefore valid, and the State Registrar could exercise those powers.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2015 17:16:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=404540" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1975 (7) TMI 150 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175119</link>
      <description>A budgeted government liability becomes attachable in execution where official correspondence shows a present, enforceable debt and not a mere proposed allocation; the amount was therefore validly attached. The communication from the Accountant General placing payment under the Court&#039;s control reinforced that the debt had crystallised. On co-operative society powers, the enabling legislation permitted delegation of all powers exercisable by the Central Registrar, and the delegation notification was wide enough to include the dissolution of the society and appointment of a liquidator. The delegation was therefore valid, and the State Registrar could exercise those powers.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175119</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>