<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (10) TMI 542 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175106</link>
    <description>Recruitment rules framed under Article 309 continue to operate until validly amended, repealed or replaced, so draft rules and executive communications cannot override the existing statutory framework. An ad hoc promotion made under unimplemented draft rules does not create a legal right to displace the regular recruitment process. A deputationist appointed temporarily pending regular selection has no indefeasible right to absorption or continued occupation beyond the governing service arrangement, and repatriation will not be interfered with merely because regular selection remains pending. The regular selection process was directed to be completed expeditiously in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2015 21:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=404510" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (10) TMI 542 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175106</link>
      <description>Recruitment rules framed under Article 309 continue to operate until validly amended, repealed or replaced, so draft rules and executive communications cannot override the existing statutory framework. An ad hoc promotion made under unimplemented draft rules does not create a legal right to displace the regular recruitment process. A deputationist appointed temporarily pending regular selection has no indefeasible right to absorption or continued occupation beyond the governing service arrangement, and repatriation will not be interfered with merely because regular selection remains pending. The regular selection process was directed to be completed expeditiously in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175106</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>