<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (7) TMI 69 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1029</link>
    <description>Mere crushing or hammering of defective cylinders, without mechanical working of metals or generation of scrap in the course of manufacture, does not amount to manufacture under the Central Excise Tariff. Where no waste or scrap arises from a manufacturing process, Section Note 8(a) of Section XV read with Chapter Heading 72.04 is not attracted, and the resulting scrap is not dutiable. The cited authorities support that position, and the appeal succeeded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 05:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=40451" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (7) TMI 69 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1029</link>
      <description>Mere crushing or hammering of defective cylinders, without mechanical working of metals or generation of scrap in the course of manufacture, does not amount to manufacture under the Central Excise Tariff. Where no waste or scrap arises from a manufacturing process, Section Note 8(a) of Section XV read with Chapter Heading 72.04 is not attracted, and the resulting scrap is not dutiable. The cited authorities support that position, and the appeal succeeded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1029</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>