https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175094 Land acquired and vested in the State extinguished the erstwhile owner's title, so later sale deeds, ministerial directions, or a claimed policy could not create any enforceable right to allotment or possession for purchasers from that owner. Article 14 also could not be used to demand repetition of an illegal allotment, because equality does not require perpetuation of an ultra vires benefit. However, considering the long lapse of time, practical hardship, and the equities of the matter, the Court did not fully unsettle the relief but modified it by directing allotment under another scheme on uniform terms. en-us Fri, 20 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 10 Jan 2017 14:52:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175094 Land acquired and vested in the State extinguished the erstwhile owner's title, so later sale deeds, ministerial directions, or a claimed policy could not create any enforceable right to allotment or possession for purchasers from that owner. Article 14 also could not be used to demand repetition of an illegal allotment, because equality does not require perpetuation of an ultra vires benefit. However, considering the long lapse of time, practical hardship, and the equities of the matter, the Court did not fully unsettle the relief but modified it by directing allotment under another scheme on uniform terms. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 20 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175094