https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1025 Mid-term anti-dumping review is valid when the designated authority forms bona fide satisfaction on relevant objective material, and final proof of dumping or injury is not required at initiation. The review in this matter was upheld because import price data and changed circumstances supported commencement. However, the dumping margin could not be sustained where adjustments to normal value and export price for raw material cost, inland freight and packing cost were not backed by verifiable evidence or actual trade records. Unsupported adjustments were rejected, and the anti-dumping duty was reduced to the revised rate accepted on review. en-us Fri, 22 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 14 Apr 2008 05:14:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1025 Mid-term anti-dumping review is valid when the designated authority forms bona fide satisfaction on relevant objective material, and final proof of dumping or injury is not required at initiation. The review in this matter was upheld because import price data and changed circumstances supported commencement. However, the dumping margin could not be sustained where adjustments to normal value and export price for raw material cost, inland freight and packing cost were not backed by verifiable evidence or actual trade records. Unsupported adjustments were rejected, and the anti-dumping duty was reduced to the revised rate accepted on review. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 22 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1025