<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 283 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267474</link>
    <description>The court held that the income tax authorities were not authorized to retain seized silver ornaments as no addition was made in the assessment for the subsequent year. The authorities were directed to return the ornaments to the petitioner within four weeks. The petition partly succeeded, and the rule was made absolute with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2015 22:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=404455" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 283 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267474</link>
      <description>The court held that the income tax authorities were not authorized to retain seized silver ornaments as no addition was made in the assessment for the subsequent year. The authorities were directed to return the ornaments to the petitioner within four weeks. The petition partly succeeded, and the rule was made absolute with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267474</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>