<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 256 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267447</link>
    <description>The penalty imposed on the first appellant was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief. However, the appeal filed by the second appellant was rejected as he was involved in attempting to export goods improperly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2015 13:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=404428" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 256 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267447</link>
      <description>The penalty imposed on the first appellant was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief. However, the appeal filed by the second appellant was rejected as he was involved in attempting to export goods improperly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267447</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>