<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 254 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267445</link>
    <description>Customs civil appeals were dismissed by the SC on both delay and merits, leaving the lower outcome undisturbed. The order reflects that the appellant did not secure relief at either the threshold stage of delay or on the substantive customs challenge. No further reasoning is set out in the text provided.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2015 22:03:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=404426" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 254 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267445</link>
      <description>Customs civil appeals were dismissed by the SC on both delay and merits, leaving the lower outcome undisturbed. The order reflects that the appellant did not secure relief at either the threshold stage of delay or on the substantive customs challenge. No further reasoning is set out in the text provided.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267445</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>