<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 238 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267429</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held the appellant liable for Cleaning Service tax, rejecting arguments for categorization under Cargo Handling or Site Formation Service. The appellant was directed to deposit a specified amount within a deadline, with a stay against recovery during the appeal. The Tribunal emphasized the cleaning aspect of waste removal and restoration activities, concluding that the primary objective was cleaning the pits. The appellant&#039;s claims of site formation were dismissed, with the Tribunal determining the focus was on cleaning the drilling site. The appellant was instructed to deposit a specified amount within a timeframe, with a waiver for the balance, and granted a stay against recovery pending appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2016 14:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=404410" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 238 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267429</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held the appellant liable for Cleaning Service tax, rejecting arguments for categorization under Cargo Handling or Site Formation Service. The appellant was directed to deposit a specified amount within a deadline, with a stay against recovery during the appeal. The Tribunal emphasized the cleaning aspect of waste removal and restoration activities, concluding that the primary objective was cleaning the pits. The appellant&#039;s claims of site formation were dismissed, with the Tribunal determining the focus was on cleaning the drilling site. The appellant was instructed to deposit a specified amount within a timeframe, with a waiver for the balance, and granted a stay against recovery pending appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267429</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>