<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 236 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267427</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a Software Development and Consultancy Services provider, in a dispute over the taxation of royalties paid for technical know-how under the category of &quot;Intellectual Property Right Services.&quot; The Tribunal held that the technical know-how did not qualify as Intellectual Property Right Services under Indian law as it did not correspond to specific rights like trademarks or patents. Relying on a Board Circular and precedent, the Tribunal emphasized that only Intellectual Property Rights recognized under Indian law are taxable. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the tax authority&#039;s order and allowed the appeal due to the lack of evidence linking the know-how to taxable Intellectual Property Rights.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 11:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=404408" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 236 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267427</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a Software Development and Consultancy Services provider, in a dispute over the taxation of royalties paid for technical know-how under the category of &quot;Intellectual Property Right Services.&quot; The Tribunal held that the technical know-how did not qualify as Intellectual Property Right Services under Indian law as it did not correspond to specific rights like trademarks or patents. Relying on a Board Circular and precedent, the Tribunal emphasized that only Intellectual Property Rights recognized under Indian law are taxable. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the tax authority&#039;s order and allowed the appeal due to the lack of evidence linking the know-how to taxable Intellectual Property Rights.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267427</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>